Paul Walmsley <p...@pwsan.com> writes:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>
>> Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com> writes:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > Just another trivial fix.
>> >
>> > From bb46b74d2b0ab3d35e72b760da7e123a891e6813 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > From: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com>
>> > Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 14:07:25 +0530
>> > Subject: [PATCH] OMAP: powerdomain: remove unused func declaration
>> >
>> > Trivial fix to remove the unused function declaration
>> > from the powerdomain header.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com>
>> > ---
>> > arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h | 1 -
>> > 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
>> > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
>> > index c66431e..0b7a357 100644
>> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
>> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/powerdomain.h
>> > @@ -165,7 +165,6 @@ struct pwrdm_ops {
>> > int (*pwrdm_wait_transition)(struct powerdomain *pwrdm);
>> > };
>> >
>> > -void pwrdm_fw_init(void);
>> > void pwrdm_init(struct powerdomain **pwrdm_list, struct pwrdm_ops
>> > *custom_funcs);
>>
>> Note this is line-wrapped.
>>
>> Looks like you need to get get-send-email setup so you can avoid having
>> the patch sending problems.
>>
>> >
>> > struct powerdomain *pwrdm_lookup(const char *name);
>>
>> In any case, with Paul's ack, I can queue this with the others.
>
> Normally I would wait for the .39 merge window with something like this,
> but you're welcome to queue it for the -rc fixes if you feel it's
> appropriate:
Yeah, I agree. I'll let you queue this one for .39 as it's not really a
fix.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
