On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Bryan Wu <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Santosh Shilimkar
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>>> Bryan Wu
>>> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 12:11 AM
>>> To: Jan, Sebastien; Santosh Shilimkar
>>> Cc: Paul Walmsley; [email protected]; Ricardo Salveti de
>>> Araujo
>>> Subject: Re: Passing mem=1G to kernel on Panda, system is unstable.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:48 AM, Jan, Sebastien <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi Santosh,
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Santosh Shilimkar
>>> > <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I just tested with the 2.6.37 mainline kernel and Bryan config,
>>> and
>>> >>> can reproduce the issue with CONFIG_SMP disabled.
>>> >> Can you try the patch I sent on the list as well ?
>>> >
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I still can reproduce this issue with mainline 2.6.37
>>> kernel + the patch here:
>> I see.
>> Since it's undefined async abort.... Mostly some clock/module race.
>> I have one more experimental debug patch if you would like to
>> try out.
>>
>> This patch just configures the interconnect space to SO instead of
>> device memory.
>>

I applied this patch to 2.6.37 kernel and try the kernel again, still
got the same bus error with this patch.

for the clock/module race, do you have any simpler test case to
generate this issue than building a whole kernel package.

Thanks,
-- 
Bryan Wu <[email protected]>
Kernel Developer    +86.138-1617-6545 Mobile
Ubuntu Kernel Team
Canonical Ltd.      www.canonical.com
Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to