On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <li...@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 11:44:59PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> At least another person did post results: >> >> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117094602.ga2...@pulham.picochip.com >> http://mid.gmane.org/20110117110308.gc2...@pulham.picochip.com > > Slightly different patch - there were three revisions. I can't attach > a tested-by given to a different patch to this one. > >> > That means omap2plus_defconfig .38 mainline kernels >> > (including -stable) will remain potentially dangerous when run on >> > SMP capable hardware. >> >> I must admit that this series looks a bit large for stable IMHO. I >> think that the fix for stable should limit itself only to prevent SMP >> from being selected if anything else than CPU_32v6K is selected. > > The first three are the bare minimum required for -stable. >
Boot tested the 14 patch series with CONFIG_SWP_EMULATE enabled, on the following boards : 1. Omap2420 SDP 2. Omap2430 SDP 3. Omap3430 SDP 4. Omap4 Blaze Tested by : Sourav Poddar <sourav.pod...@ti.com> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
