On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 03:08:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 07:02:50PM +0530, G, Manjunath Kondaiah wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 09:19:53AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:54:05AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 03, 2011 at 08:51:46PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote: > > > > > The ads7846 driver requests a gpio but does not currently > > > > > configure it explicitly as an input. Use gpio_request_one > > > > > to request and configure it at one shot. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Sourav Poddar <[email protected]> > > > > > Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > Will apply this one, the other one is a bit messy IMO, will have to > > > > think about it. > > > > > > > > > > Something like below should do I think. > > Patch looks good but it applies only on top of previous patch: > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/529941/ > > > > Why to have two patches for this fix? > > http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg45167.html My point here is: 1. The first patch only replaces gpio_request with gpio_request_one 2. Rest of the things are handled in 2nd patch posted by dmitry
What is harm in merging both the patches? I don't think it affects readability. -Manjunath -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
