Hi, On Thu, 2011-02-03 at 07:56 -0600, Murthy, Raghuveer wrote: > - Adding dss_feature for DPLL fclk > - Enabling pixel clock generation for DPI interface
A bit more description what the patch set is about would be nice. Also, one line patch descriptions are a bit too short for anything else than the most trivial patches. Now to the actual patch contents: DPLL is not a feature of the DSS, and I don't think we should have dss_features for that. In fact, I think the whole DPLL code should be moved from DSS to somewhere under arch/arm. In a perfect world DSS could just set the dss_fck to whatever rate it requires, but as the clock rate can only be set to certain rates, and we need a precise control for the rate, some other method has to be in place. I am not sure what this method should be. Perhaps there is something in the clock framework that could help us here, or perhaps we just need a bunch of function pointers in the DSS's platform data which can be used to configure the clock. Tomi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
