On Mon, 2011-02-28 at 09:02 -0600, Semwal, Sumit wrote:
> Provide a function in pdata to allow dss submodules to check if a given
> clock is available on a platform as an optional clock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Senthilvadivu Guruswamy <[email protected]>
> (based on implementation from Senthil)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Semwal <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c             |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/display.h |    2 ++
>  2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> index 5ab6a74..9f4f862 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/display.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,25 @@ static struct omap_device_pm_latency omap_dss_latency[] = {
>       },
>  };
>  
> +static bool opt_clock_available(const char *clk_role)
> +{
> +     int i;
> +     struct omap_hwmod *oh;
> +
> +     /* opt_clks are always associated with dss hwmod */
> +     oh = omap_hwmod_lookup("dss_core");
> +     if (!oh) {
> +             pr_err("Could not look up dss_core.\n");
> +             return -ENODEV;

The function returns a bool. Perhaps the lookup would be better done in
omap_display_init(), and stored in a static variable.

Or if it's clear that this should never happen, BUG_ON(!oh);

 Tomi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to