Rajendra Nayak <rna...@ti.com> writes: >> In terms of triage, does this patch fix something that currently doesn't >> work (meaning that we should try to merge it for 2.6.39)? Or can we plan >> to merge this during the 2.6.40 time frame? It would be ideal, of course, >> if we could wait until 2.6.40, given how close we are to the merge window >> opening. > > Since no clockdomains on OMAP4 were programmed in HW_AUTO untill now, > we did not have any issues, but with the recent series from Santosh > (which adds mpu ret/off support in idle/suspend) programming the > clockdomains to HW_AUTO did show issues/aborts, and this patch > fixes them.
FWIW, I was planning to merge the OMAP4 MPU ret/off series from Santosh for 2.6.39, so this patch would be required for that to series to work. Kevin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
