On 3/12/2011 1:23 PM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Hi Kevin,

On 3/11/2011 10:17 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
Rajendra Nayak<rna...@ti.com>  writes:

[...]


It's also breaking boot on OMAP35xx BeagleBoard rev C2.  The kernel
boot messages are below - omap2plus_defconfig + DEBUG_LL.  Reverting
the patch fixes it.  Could you please take a look?

I got hold of a Beagle, a sticker on which says rev C1D.
Not sure if there is a better way to identify the rev, but
this one seems to boot fine for me even with this patch.
I just applied this one patch on top of the the tag
'integration-2.6.39-20110310-008' of git://git.pwsan.com/linux-
integration.

In the process of testing Santosh's OMAP4 PM series (which includes
$SUBJECT patch) on OMAP3, I also noticed some problems on beagle (mine
is a C3.)

Specifially, with $SUBJECT patch applied, none of the powerdomains ever
reach inactive or RET during idle (suspend seems to work fine.)

Just reverting $SUBJECT patch makes things go back to working normally.

I pushed the test branch I used which is a merge of Santosh's v3 branch
with my pm branch (branch: tmp/santosh-omap4-pm)

I tested by first doing a suspend test and confirming all the
powerdomains hit retention.  That worked fine.  Then I did an idle test:

   echo 5>  /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.0/sleep_timeout
   echo 5>  /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.1/sleep_timeout
   echo 5>  /sys/devices/platform/omap/omap_uart.2/sleep_timeout
   echo 1>  /debug/pm_debug/sleep_while_idle

and waited for the UARTs to timeout.

Well after the UART timeouts expired, I do not see any powerdomains
transitioning from ON.

What's even more strange is that the same thing is working fine on all
the other OMAP3 platforms I tested: 3430/n900, 3630/zoom3 and even a
different 3530-based platform, the OMAP3EVM.

I probably know whats going wrong with this patch, even though I
haven't really been able to reproduce any of these issues myself.

The below change which should be the only one affecting non-OMAP4
platforms actually is calling clkdm_allow_idle() for all clkdms
without really checking for a CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO flag, which
seems wrong. I was somehow under the impression that the
clkdm_allow_idle() function would internally do this check but
that does not seem to be the case.

Actually I was wrong, clkdm_allow_idle() does seem to have a
check for the CLKDM_CAN_ENABLE_AUTO flag.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to