Paul Walmsley <[email protected]> writes:

> Hi Kevin,
>
> a couple of comments, now that i have the chance to look this over 
> closely.
>
> Probably we should require every powerdomain to have a voltagedomain.  
> This will avoid the problems we're having with the clocks, in which not 
> every clock has a clockdomain pointer. 
>
> So I'd suggest splitting this patch up into two patches -- one to make the 
> changes the powerdomain structure, and the second to add the code into the 
> powerdomain.c.  Between these two patches, we'd need patches to the 
> powerdomain data to add the voltagedomain names in.

OK, Benoit and I talked earlier today and agreed on this as well.  He
has already generated the OMAP4 data as well, so split up, and drop the
checks below as you suggest.

Kevin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to