Hi All,

> Hello All,
> 
> Any comments on this patch?
> 
> Regards,
> Keerthy
> 
> On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com> wrote:
> > twl4030_wdt driver and omap_wdt driver are registering as misc_device name 
> > as
> > "watchdog" and the same minor number WATCHDOG_MINOR( value = 130).
> > There is a conflict since the name and minor were the same for
> > both the misc_device registered by omap_wdt.c as well as twl4030_wdt.c
> >
> > The omap_wdt.c probe is getting called first. Hence it succeeds.
> > twl4030_wdt.c always failed on the minor number comparison check.
> > Now requesting for MISC_DYNAMIC_MINOR as the minor
> > number for twl4030_watchdog and renamed the device name as
> > "twl4030_watchdog".
> >
> > Tested for basic boot up on OMAP4 Blaze and OMAP3630 SDP. OMAP3630 SDP
> > twl4030_wdt registration succeeds.2430SDP boot tested, watchdog registration
> > without errors.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>

NAK. Reason: a watchdog daemon will only be using /dev/watchdog.
The plan is to get the generic watchdog framework in, convert most of the 
drivers, extend teh generic watchdog framework with a sysfs interface so that 
we can support multiple watchdogs.

Kind regards,
Wim.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to