On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 13:21 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> On Friday 01 April 2011 12:37 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
> > On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 12:35 +0530, Archit Taneja wrote:
> >> On Thursday 31 March 2011 03:40 PM, Valkeinen, Tomi wrote:
> >>> Clock configuration was defined inside dssdev.phy.dsi struct. The clock
> >>> config doesn't really belong there, and so it's moved to dssdev.clock
> >>> struct.
> >>>
> >>> Now the explicit clock configuration could also be used for other
> >>> interfaces than DSI, although there's no support for it currently.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen<tomi.valkei...@ti.com>
> >>> ---
> >>>    arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c       |   14 +++++++++-----
> >>>    arch/arm/plat-omap/include/plat/display.h |   28 
> >>> ++++++++++++++++------------
> >>>    drivers/video/omap2/dss/dsi.c             |   14 +++++++-------
> >>>    3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c 
> >>> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> >>> index 05288c9..626b16b 100644
> >>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-4430sdp.c
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >>> @@ -424,6 +412,22 @@ struct omap_dss_device {
> >>>           } phy;
> >>>
> >>>           struct {
> >>> +         struct {
> >>> +                 u16 lck_div;
> >>> +                 u16 pck_div;
> >>
> >> Is it possible to wrap these members around a channel member? The board
> >> file can then fill up the lck_div and ppck_div based on what channel it
> >> is using.
> >
> > Hmm. What do you mean "wrap around"? The channel is defined a bit below
> > there.
> >
> 
> I meant something like:
>       
>       ...
>       struct {
>               struct {
>                       struct {
>                               u16 lck_div;
>                               u16 pck_div;
>                       } channel[MAX_CHANNELS];
>               } dispc;
> 
>               ...
> 
>               struct {
> 
>               } dsi;
> 
>       } clocks;
>       ...
> 
> Or something equivalent to the thing above, like using a pointer to an 
> array.

What would be the benefit of that? A dss device can be connected only to
one channel. Now we have the dividers and the channel defined, and
omapdss can use this info to configure the dividers for that channel
properly.

 Tomi


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to