On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 11:10, Kevin Hilman <khil...@ti.com> wrote: > So here's a dumb question, being rather ignorant of CPUfreq on SMP. > > Should we be running a CPUfreq instance on both CPUs when they cannot be > scaled independently? > > What is being scaled here is actually the cluster (the MPU SS via > dpll_mpu_ck), not an individual CPU. So to me, it only makes sense to > have a an instance of the driver per scalable device, which in this case > is a single MPU SS. > > What am I missing?
my understanding from the code is that we have one instance of cpufreq controllable from either cpu0 or 1. Regards, Nishanth Menon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
