> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Lindgren
> Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2011 5:11 PM
> To: Tasslehoff Kjappfot
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix wrong OMAP_ES_x_y defines that make
> omap_rev_lt_x_y and friends misbehave
>
> * Tasslehoff Kjappfot <[email protected]> [110614 03:35]:
> > From 620fa271b32f8bdd8f06954c0a2c96af6ed1dc7b Mon Sep 17
> 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Tasslehoff Kjappfot <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 12:06:09 +0200
> > Subject: [PATCH] Fix wrong OMAP_ES_x_y defines that make
> > omap_rev_lt_x_y and friends misbehave
>
> Hmm, we don't seem to have these in the mainline kernel?
> Maybe take a look if something still needs to patched
> there?
[sp] Yes. these don't apply on mainline.
I believe the kernel is using this patch I submitted [1],
(or derived from it), but missing [2].
Tony,
Now that there are multiple processors with their own
revisions, do you believe an update version of [1]
patch would be useful?
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=127972517400499&w=2
[2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=128597605524824&w=2
~sanjeev
>
> Tony
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
