Rafael,

2011/7/29 Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl>:
> On Thursday, July 28, 2011, jean.pi...@newoldbits.com wrote:
>> From: Jean Pihet <j-pi...@ti.com>
>>
>> The PM QoS implementation files are better named
>> kernel/pm_qos.c and include/linux/pm_qos.h.
>>
...

>>  create mode 100644 include/linux/pm_qos.h
>>  delete mode 100644 include/linux/pm_qos_params.h
>
> That I agree with.
>
>>  create mode 100644 kernel/pm_qos.c
>>  delete mode 100644 kernel/pm_qos_params.c
>
> As I said, please move that file to kernel/power and call it qos.c.
Ok

>
> That said the device interface should be located in drivers/base/power
> to follow our current conventions.
By device interface I understand the following:
- the user space API (per-device sysfs entry),
- the in-kernel device specific PM QoS API. If needed, cf. comments on
[04/13] about that.

Is that correct?

>
> Thanks,
> Rafael

Thanks,
Jean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to