[]...
+ init_data->supply_regulator = (char *)of_get_property(dev->of_node,
+ "regulator-supplies", NULL);
I'd expect that in the device tree world the supply regulator would
reference the node for that regulator.
You mean using phandles? Thats what Grant proposed too but
I thought you instead had an inclination towards names? Or maybe
I misunderstood.
They need both. We need to reference the device that provides the
supply and use a name to say which of the potentially multiple supplies
on the consumer device is which.
Mark, I still seem to be a little confused with this one as to why
we would need a phandle *and* a supply-name to reference a parent
regulator/supply.
The phandle would point to a regulator dt node and that node internally
would have just one name associated with it.
Hrm, I think loosing the signs here is bad karma - negative voltages do
exist after all.
Oops.. they do? didn't know about that.
Yup, ground is just a reference point.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
