* Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> [111003 15:05]: > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > > * Nicolas Pitre <n...@fluxnic.net> [111003 11:26]: > > > > > > > > Furthermore... there is also a static mapping for physical address > > > > 0x4e000000 using virtual address 0xff100000 which is already reserved > > > > for other purposes i.e. the consistent DMA area. It is not immediately > > > > obvious where this comes from without being intimate with the OMAP > > > > code. > > > > Can this be fixed as well i.e. moved elsewhere please? > > > > > > This sounds like a bug somewhere. Which omap are you seeing this on? > > > > OMAP4430 on a Panda board. > > > > Here are the static mappings I'm seeing: > > > > phys = 0x44000000 virt = 0xf8000000 size = 0x100000 > > phys = 0x4a000000 virt = 0xfc000000 size = 0x400000 > > phys = 0x50000000 virt = 0xf9000000 size = 0x100000 > > phys = 0x4c000000 virt = 0xfd100000 size = 0x100000 > > phys = 0x4d000000 virt = 0xfe100000 size = 0x100000 > > phys = 0x4e000000 virt = 0xff100000 size = 0x100000 <--- > > phys = 0x48000000 virt = 0xfa000000 size = 0x400000 > > phys = 0x54000000 virt = 0xfe800000 size = 0x800000 > > It looks like this comes from OMAP44XX_DMM_VIRT. > > #define OMAP44XX_DMM_PHYS OMAP44XX_DMM_BASE > /* 0x4e000000 --> 0xfd300000 > */ > #define OMAP44XX_DMM_VIRT (OMAP44XX_DMM_PHYS + OMAP4_L3_PER_IO_OFFSET) > #define OMAP44XX_DMM_SIZE SZ_1M > > The comment suggesting a mapping correspondance is obviously wrong. We have: > > #define OMAP44XX_DMM_BASE 0x4e000000 > #define OMAP4_L3_PER_IO_OFFSET 0xb1100000 > > Hence 0x4e000000 + 0xb1100000 = 0xff100000.
Seem like it might cause some random patterns in tiler :) Santosh, can youp please check it? Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
