+ Rajendra, Santosh, Benoît

Hi

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote:

> * Paul Walmsley <p...@pwsan.com> [110929 17:40]:
> > On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Keerthy wrote:
> > 
> > > From: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath...@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > OMAP4460 specific clocks are not getting added as the
> > > cpu_is_omap44xx is choosing only OMAP4430 specific clock nodes.
> > > Changing it to add to OMAP4460 specific clocks also.
> > > This is clocks are required of temperature sensor.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Vishwanath BS <vishwanath...@ti.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Keerthy <j-keer...@ti.com>
> > > Cc: p...@pwsan.com 
> > 
> > Thanks, this patch has been queued for 3.2.
> 
> Should this be a fix for the -rc cycle instead?

I don't think it's needed for the -rc series, since we don't have any 
in-tree users of the 4460 temperature sensor.  The only impact I can see 
is if the bootloader enables the 4460 temperature sensor clock, and 
doesn't disable it.  I assume that would probably prevent the L4 WKUP 
clockdomain from entering clock stop, which would consume a little more 
power.

But maybe Benoît, Rajendra, or Santosh can correct me if this 
off-the-cuff analysis is incorrect.

- Paul

Reply via email to