On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 09:49:38PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:

> Device nodes in DT can associate themselves with one or more
> regulators/supply by providing a list of phandles (to regulator nodes)
> and corresponding supply names.

Mostly looks good.

> +/**
> + * of_get_regulator - get a regulator device node based on supply name
> + * @dev: Device pointer for the consumer (of regulator) device
> + * @supply: regulator supply name
> + *
> + * Extract the regulator device node corresponding to the supply name.
> + * retruns the device node corresponding to the regulator if found, else
> + * returns NULL.
> + */
> +struct device_node *of_get_regulator(struct device *dev, const char *supply)
> +{

Should be static.

> @@ -1178,6 +1225,10 @@ static struct regulator *_regulator_get(struct device 
> *dev, const char *id,
>                       goto found;
>               }
>       }
> +     if (!dev)
> +             list_for_each_entry(rdev, &regulator_list, list)
> +                     if (strcmp(rdev_get_name(rdev), id))
> +                             goto found;
>  

This looks really strange, we didn't remove any old lookup code and the
DT lookup jumps to found by iself so why are we adding code here?

> +     if (supply) {
> +             struct regulator_dev *r;
> +             struct device_node *node;
> +
> +             /* first do a dt based lookup */
> +             if (dev) {
> +                     node = of_get_regulator(dev, supply);
> +                     if (node)
> +                             list_for_each_entry(r, &regulator_list, list)
> +                                     if (node == r->dev.parent->of_node)
> +                                             goto found;
>               }
>  
> -             if (!found) {
> -                     dev_err(dev, "Failed to find supply %s\n",
> -                             init_data->supply_regulator);
> -                     ret = -ENODEV;
> -                     goto scrub;
> -             }
> +             /* next try doing it non-dt way */
> +             list_for_each_entry(r, &regulator_list, list)
> +                     if (strcmp(rdev_get_name(r), supply) == 0)
> +                             goto found;
>  
> +             dev_err(dev, "Failed to find supply %s\n", supply);
> +             ret = -ENODEV;
> +             goto scrub;
> +
> +found:

This is all getting *really* complicated and illegible.  I'm not sure
what the best way to structure is but erroring out early looks useful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to