On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 20:15, <[email protected]> wrote: > static struct platform_device* __init omap4_init_pmu(void) > { > int id = -1; > @@ -420,6 +472,10 @@ static struct platform_device* __init > omap4_init_pmu(void) > return NULL; > } > > + omap4_pmu_data.handle_irq = omap4_pmu_handler; > + omap4_pmu_data.enable_irq = omap4_enable_cti; > + omap4_pmu_data.disable_irq = omap4_disable_cti; > + > pd = omap_device_build_ss(dev_name, id, oh, 3, &omap4_pmu_data, > sizeof(omap4_pmu_data), > omap_pmu_latency, > @@ -440,7 +496,9 @@ static void __init omap_init_pmu(void) > pd = omap4_init_pmu(); > if (!pd) > return; > - omap_device_enable(pd); > + > + omap_device_enable(&od->pdev); > + omap4_configure_pmu_irq();
This doesn't build, because there's no "od" in this function. I guess you shouldn't be changing the omap_device_enable() call. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
