* Igor Grinberg <[email protected]> [120223 05:56]:
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-cm-t35.c
> > @@ -411,9 +411,9 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
> > {
> > .mmc = 1,
> > .caps = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA,
> > - .gpio_cd = -EINVAL,
> > + .gpio_cd = OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES + 0,
> > .gpio_wp = -EINVAL,
I don't have these changes, in my second revision of the patch.
It's best not to hardcode the values here.
> > -
> > + .deferred = true,
> > },
> > {
> > .mmc = 2,
> > @@ -422,6 +422,7 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
> > .gpio_cd = -EINVAL,
> > .gpio_wp = -EINVAL,
> > .ocr_mask = 0x00100000, /* 3.3V */
> > + .deferred = true,
>
> Why do you defer this one?
> It does not use external GPIO chip, in fact it does not use CD/WP at all.
Why do you have the following then to set gpio_cd?
> > },
> > {} /* Terminator */
> > };
> > @@ -469,9 +470,7 @@ static int cm_t35_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
> > unsigned gpio,
> > pr_err("CM-T35: could not obtain gpio for WiFi reset\n");
> > }
> >
> > - /* gpio + 0 is "mmc0_cd" (input/IRQ) */
> > - mmc[0].gpio_cd = gpio + 0;
> > - omap2_hsmmc_init(mmc);
> > + omap_hsmmc_deferred_add(mmc);
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
Hmm I don't have omap_hsmmc_deferred_add() in my second version
of the patch either.
Rajendra, please do the patches on that, now it's impossible to
see what else you've changed. That's the version posted here:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg64884.html
> > @@ -639,6 +638,7 @@ static void __init cm_t3x_common_init(void)
> > omap_serial_init();
> > omap_sdrc_init(mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params,
> > mt46h32m32lf6_sdrc_params);
> > + omap_hsmmc_init(mmc);
> > cm_t35_init_i2c();
> > omap_ads7846_init(1, CM_T35_GPIO_PENDOWN, 0, NULL);
> > cm_t35_init_ethernet();
>
> Other then the comment above, looks fine.
> I will probably be able to test this on Sunday.
OK
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c
> > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c
> > index a59ace0..11a6aa4 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-igep0020.c
> > @@ -293,8 +293,9 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
> > {
> > .mmc = 1,
> > .caps = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA,
> > - .gpio_cd = -EINVAL,
> > + .gpio_cd = OMAP_MAX_GPIO_LINES + 0,
> > .gpio_wp = -EINVAL,
> > + .deferred = true,
> > },
> > #if defined(CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO) || defined(CONFIG_LIBERTAS_SDIO_MODULE)
> > {
> > @@ -302,6 +303,7 @@ static struct omap2_hsmmc_info mmc[] = {
> > .caps = MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA,
> > .gpio_cd = -EINVAL,
> > .gpio_wp = -EINVAL,
> > + .deferred = true,
>
> same here, why defer it?
Because it too sets gpio_cd in the callback.
> ditto
ditto, that too sets gpio_cd..
> > },
> > #endif
> > {} /* Terminator */
> > @@ -360,10 +362,8 @@ static int omap3evm_twl_gpio_setup(struct device *dev,
> > {
> > int r, lcd_bl_en;
> >
> > - /* gpio + 0 is "mmc0_cd" (input/IRQ) */
> > omap_mux_init_gpio(63, OMAP_PIN_INPUT);
> > - mmc[0].gpio_cd = gpio + 0;
..here. Same for the others. So maybe check is some are wrong?
Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
