On Tuesday 06 March 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:11:37PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I think 'depends' would be better here, because selecting IOMMU_SUPPORT
> > > has other side-effects that a user might not want. It's just as likely
> > > that someone wants to disable IOMMU_SUPPORT and needs to find
> > > OMAP_REMOTEPROC
> > > as wanting to enable OMAP_REMOTEPROC and having to find IOMMU_SUPPORT.
> > >
> > > In most cases, the defconfig should just set both.
> >
> > Ok, 'depends on' it is.
>
> We're a week on, which means I now have a full set of 7 builds on the
> website for OMAP4430 all of which have failed in part due to this
> as yet unresolved problem.
>
> What's happening to get it fixed and those fixes into whatever tree is
> necessary for them (presumably arm-soc)?
Ohad has sent a series of patches for review and there were no comments
on those. The fix was part of it as far as I remember. I'm still waiting
for a pull request from Ohad.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
