On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 10:06 -0500, Rob Clark wrote: > > Well, as I said, it's not an issue for me and from my side it can be > > improved later. > > yeah, when CMA is actually merged, there are a few other things I'd > like to do to, incl converting omapfb over to use CMA and remove > omap_vram.. but I guess those will be other patches.
Right, I just realized CMA is not in the kernel, nor does it seem to be in the linux-next. Is there a reason why you want it already merged? Wouldn't it be easier to get it in only when it can actually be used. Especially if there's room for improvement. Tomi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
