On Mon, 2012-03-19 at 15:02 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> It is possible for regulator_enable() to fail and if it does fail that's
> generally a bad sign for anything we try to do with the hardware afterwards
> so check for and immediately return an error if regulator_enable() fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
> ---
>  .../video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.c    |    5 ++++-
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.c 
> b/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.c
> index 32f3fcd..74c6b87 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/omap2/displays/panel-tpo-td043mtea1.c
> @@ -272,11 +272,14 @@ static const struct omap_video_timings 
> tpo_td043_timings = {
>  static int tpo_td043_power_on(struct tpo_td043_device *tpo_td043)
>  {
>       int nreset_gpio = tpo_td043->nreset_gpio;
> +     int r;
>  
>       if (tpo_td043->powered_on)
>               return 0;
>  
> -     regulator_enable(tpo_td043->vcc_reg);
> +     r = regulator_enable(tpo_td043->vcc_reg);
> +     if (r != 0)
> +             return r;
>  
>       /* wait for regulator to stabilize */
>       msleep(160);

Thanks, I'll apply this series to omapdss tree.

 Tomi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to