Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]> writes:

> cpu_class_is_omap2() contains all OMAP2+ devices. So update the DMA code
> cpu checks accordingly so that there is no need to patch
> the file for any future OMAP2+ devices.
>
> In long run, all these attributes should come from hwmod dev_attr based
> on DMA IP version.
>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c |    2 +-
>  arch/arm/plat-omap/dma.c  |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c
> index b19d849..2750bb9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/dma.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,7 @@ static int __init omap2_system_dma_init_dev(struct 
> omap_hwmod *oh, void *unused)
>  
>       dma_stride              = OMAP2_DMA_STRIDE;
>       dma_common_ch_start     = CSDP;
> -     if (cpu_is_omap3630() || cpu_is_omap44xx())
> +     if (omap_rev() >= OMAP3630_REV_ES1_0)

It's not obvious (at least to me) that this is equivalent.

For example, this will now be true on the TI81xx devices.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to