Hi Sakari,

Thanks for the patch.

On Wednesday 09 May 2012 08:00:41 Sakari Ailus wrote:
> The OMAP 3630 has configuration how the ISP CSI-2 PHY pins are connected to
> the actual CSI-2 receivers outside the ISP itself. Allow changing this
> configuration from the ISP driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
> ---
> Hi,
> 
> This patch does what was discussed some time ago: provide a bit more high
> level interface than the registers for the ISP driver to change the CSI-2
> PHY mappings.
> 
> omap_writel()/omap_readl() functions are no longer there so this works as a
> convenient push to write a patch such as this. ;-)
> 
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c              |   32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/control.h |   11 +++++++++
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/control.h
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
> index 08e674b..78c27b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/control.c
> @@ -12,9 +12,12 @@
>   */
>  #undef DEBUG
> 
> +#include <linux/export.h>
>  #include <linux/kernel.h>
>  #include <linux/io.h>
> 
> +#include <mach/control.h>
> +
>  #include <plat/hardware.h>
>  #include <plat/sdrc.h>
> 
> @@ -564,4 +567,33 @@ int omap3_ctrl_save_padconf(void)
>       return 0;
>  }
> 
> +void omap3_ctrl_csi2_select(u32 csi2cfg)
> +{
> +     /* FIXME: Do 34xx / 35xx require something here? */

Well, maybe it's time to find out whether it does ?

> +     if (cpu_is_omap3630()) {

I would test !cpu_is_omap3630() and return, that would lower the indentation 
level.

> +             u32 cam_phy_ctrl =
> +                     omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP3630_CONTROL_CAMERA_PHY_CTRL);
> +
> +             /*
> +              * SCM.CONTROL_CAMERA_PHY_CTRL
> +              * - bit[4]    : CSIPHY1 data sent to CSIB
> +              * - bit [3:2] : CSIPHY1 config: 00 d-phy, 01/10 ccp2
> +              * - bit [1:0] : CSIPHY2 config: 00 d-phy, 01/10 ccp2
> +              */
> +             if (csi2cfg == OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY1_CCP2B)
> +                     cam_phy_ctrl |= 1 << 2;
> +             else if (csi2cfg == OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY1_CSI2C)
> +                     cam_phy_ctrl &= ~(1 << 2);
> +
> +             if (csi2cfg == OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY2_CCP2B)
> +                     cam_phy_ctrl |= 1;
> +             else if (csi2cfg == OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY2_CSI2A)
> +                     cam_phy_ctrl &= ~1;
> +
> +             omap_ctrl_writel(cam_phy_ctrl,
> +                              OMAP3630_CONTROL_CAMERA_PHY_CTRL);
> +     }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(omap3_ctrl_csi2_select);
> +
>  #endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 && CONFIG_PM */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/control.h
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/control.h new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..4490b7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/include/mach/control.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
> +#ifndef __MACH_CONTROL_H__
> +#define __MACH_CONTROL_H__
> +
> +#define OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY1_CCP2B      (1 << 0)
> +#define OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY1_CSI2C      (1 << 1)
> +#define OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY2_CCP2B      (1 << 2)
> +#define OMAP3_CTRL_CSI2_SELECT_PHY2_CSI2A      (1 << 3)

As you only test for equality, does a bitmask really make sense ?

> +void omap3_ctrl_csi2_select(u32 csi2cfg);
> +
> +#endif /* __MACH_CONTROL_H__ */
-- 
Regards,

Laurent Pinchart

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to