On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Eduardo Valentin
<[email protected]> wrote:
> This patch exposes the definitions under control.h to
> drivers outside the machine code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
> ---
After second thought, this complete header movement needs to avoided.
Drivers should not anyway include something like <mach/control.h>

May be split the control.h header file data into ..
- defines used by mach-omap2/* files which can remain in "control.h"
in existing location.
- common functions/defines used across drivers/*, mach-omap2/*,
plat-omap/*, should
go to include/linux/omap_control.h
- Driver specific defines like thermal, usb etc, should go to
respective drivers file.

What do you think ?

Regards
santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to