Nishanth Menon <[email protected]> writes:

> Commit 9fa2df6b90786301b175e264f5fa9846aba81a65
> (ARM: OMAP2+: OPP: allow OPP enumeration to continue if device is not present)
> makes the logic:
> for (i = 0; i < opp_def_size; i++) {
>       <snip>
>       if (!oh || !oh->od) {
>               <snip>
>               continue;
>       }
> <snip>
> opp_def++;
> }
>
> In short, the moment we hit a "Bad OPP", we end up looping the list
> comparing against the bad opp definition pointer for the rest of the
> iteration count. Instead, increment opp_def in the for loop itself
> and allow continue to be used in code without much thought so that
> we check the next set of OPP definition pointers :)
>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Steve Sakoman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>

Good catch.

Queuing for my next set of PM fixes for v3.5-rc (branch: for_3.5/fixes/pm-2)

Thanks for the fix!

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to