On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:17 AM, Govindraj.R <govindraj.r...@ti.com> wrote:
[...]
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/prm2xxx_3xxx.h
> @@ -289,6 +289,13 @@ static inline int omap2_prm_deassert_hardreset(s16
> prm_mod, u8 rst_shift,
> "not suppose to be used on omap4\n");
> return 0;
> }
> +static inline void omap2_prm_enable_prcm_module_wakeup(s16 prcm_mod,
> + u8 prm_reg_id, u8 prm_reg_shift, bool set_wake)
> +{
> + WARN(1, "prm: omap2xxx/omap3xxx specific function and "
> + "not suppose to be used on omap4\n");
> + return 0;
^^^^^ minor comment - we should not return a value in a function returning void
[...]
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
