Hi Will,
On 06/06/2012 12:33 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 02:19:02PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Hi Will,
>
> Hi Jon,
>
>> On 06/04/2012 04:44 PM, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Anyway, let me know what you think of this approach. An alternative is
>> to put the calls pm_runtime_get/put outside of the reserve/release_pmu,
>> which would be a simpler change, but I was thinking that the above maybe
>> more aligned with your thinking.
>
> Ok, thanks for this. Whilst your code is definitely more like I'm
> envisaging, you're right about the churn and until I've sorted out the
> reservation code so that it's a callback via the PMU structure, it is
> overly messy.
>
> So for the time being let's do what you suggested and put the suspend/resume
> calls into armpmu_{reserve,release}_hardware. We can still kill the irq
> enable/disable calls and I can rework this slightly when I change the
> reservation code.
Sounds good. I will send out my V2 series tomorrow that will include the
above change.
Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
