Hi Jon,
On Thu, Jun 07, 2012 at 10:22:03PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> index 186c8cb..00adb98 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/spinlock.h>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>
> #include <asm/cputype.h>
> #include <asm/irq.h>
> @@ -367,8 +368,6 @@ armpmu_release_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> {
> int i, irq, irqs;
> struct platform_device *pmu_device = armpmu->plat_device;
> - struct arm_pmu_platdata *plat =
> - dev_get_platdata(&pmu_device->dev);
>
> irqs = min(pmu_device->num_resources, num_possible_cpus());
>
> @@ -376,14 +375,12 @@ armpmu_release_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(i, &armpmu->active_irqs))
> continue;
> irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
> - if (irq >= 0) {
> - if (plat && plat->disable_irq)
> - plat->disable_irq(irq);
> + if (irq >= 0)
> free_irq(irq, armpmu);
> - }
> }
>
> release_pmu(armpmu->type);
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(&armpmu->plat_device->dev);
We probably want to suspend the device before releasing it, otherwise we
could race against somebody else trying to initialise the PMU again.
>
> static int
> @@ -403,6 +400,8 @@ armpmu_reserve_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> return err;
> }
>
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(&armpmu->plat_device->dev);
Better pass &pmu_device->dev instead (similarly in release).
> +
> plat = dev_get_platdata(&pmu_device->dev);
> if (plat && plat->handle_irq)
> handle_irq = armpmu_platform_irq;
> @@ -440,8 +439,7 @@ armpmu_reserve_hardware(struct arm_pmu *armpmu)
> irq);
> armpmu_release_hardware(armpmu);
> return err;
> - } else if (plat && plat->enable_irq)
> - plat->enable_irq(irq);
> + }
>
> cpumask_set_cpu(i, &armpmu->active_irqs);
> }
> @@ -584,6 +582,28 @@ static void armpmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
> armpmu->stop();
> }
There are potential failure paths in the reservation code here where we
don't `put' the PMU back. Can you move the pm_runtime_get_sync call later in
the function, or does it have to called before we enable the IRQ line?
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> +static int armpmu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct arm_pmu_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> + if (plat->runtime_resume)
I think you need to check plat too since it may be NULL on other platforms.
> + return plat->runtime_resume(dev);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int armpmu_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct arm_pmu_platdata *plat = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> + if (plat->runtime_suspend)
Same here.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
