On 18 June 2012 17:54, Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkei...@ti.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 17:16 +0530, Jassi Brar wrote:
>> So preferably I would move request_threaded_irq() to after >> hdmi_check_hpd_state() in ti_hdmi_4xxx_phy_enable() and convert the > > No, you can't move the check. If you move it, the HPD state could change > between the check and the request_irq, and we'd miss it. > Wouldn't we then get an irq, and hence another hdmi_check_hpd_state(), for that? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
