On Saturday 23 June 2012 12:47 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote:
Hi
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
In preparation of OMAP moving to Common Clk Framework(CCF) add clk_prepare()
for omap gpio debounce clock.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak<[email protected]>
Cc: Grant Likely<[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index c4ed172..6a73b01 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -893,6 +893,8 @@ static int gpio_debounce(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned
offset,
bank->dbck = clk_get(bank->dev, "dbclk");
if (IS_ERR(bank->dbck))
dev_err(bank->dev, "Could not get gpio dbck\n");
+ else
+ clk_prepare(bank->dbck);
}
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
What code unprepares this clock?
Put differently, doesn't this driver need at least a platform_driver
.remove function pointer, that would call clk_unprepare() and clk_put()?
Maybe because this driver can never be built as a module. It gets
complied in with CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP=y.
Adding Tarun and Santosh who can comment further.
Also, it looks to me that the bank->dbck init should be in
omap_gpio_chip_init(), not gpio_debounce()?
Tarun, can you comment on why the dbck init is in gpio_debounce
and not in omap_gpio_chip_init()?
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
