On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 12:54:54, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Vaibhav Hiremath <hvaib...@ti.com> [120703 06:12]:
> > Initially, we decided to make am33xx family of device to fall
> > under omap3 class (cpu_is_omap34xx() = true), since it carries
> > Cortex-A8 core. But while adding complete baseport support
> > (like, clock, power and hwmod) support, it is observed that,
> > we are creating more and more problems by treating am33xx device
> > as omap3 family, as nothing matches between them
> > (except cortex-A8 mpu).
> > 
> > So,  after long discussion we have came to the conclusion that,
> > we should not consider am33xx device as omap3 family, instead
> > create separate class (SOC_AM33XX) under OMAP2PLUS.
> > This means, for am33xx device, cpu_is_omap34xx() will return false,
> > and only cpu_is_am33xx() will be true.
> 
> Thanks applying both.
> 

Thanks Tony,


Thanks,
Vaibhav
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to