* Paul Walmsley <p...@pwsan.com> [120719 12:17]:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> 
> > Well I'm still a bit confused :)
> > 
> > Which branch in arm-soc tree should this fix be applied then?
> 
> In terms of arm-soc, it's needed in arm-soc for-next, due to commit 
> 066b6eba6d58ad1cb9ec3917b6ee79730c3c3310 ("Merge branch 'next/cleanup' 
> into for-next").  That merge commit resolves the conflict the same way 
> that the linux-omap tree commit 3dd50d0545bd5a8ad83d4339f07935cd3e883271 
> ("Merge tag 'omap-cleanup-for-v3.6' into tmp-merge") did.
> 
> 066b6eba is also present in a few other arm-soc branches:
> 
>   arm-soc/staging/io-cleanup-pci
>   arm-soc/tmp
> 
> I did not do an exhaustive search for similar mismerges under different 
> commit IDs.

OK looks like Linus fixed up part of it, care to check what's needed
against current mainline now?

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to