Hello.
On 25-07-2012 15:05, Konstantin Baydarov wrote:
OMAP system control module can be probed early, then
omap_type is safe to use its APIs.
TODO: add support for other omap versions
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Konstantin Baydarov <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c | 11 ++++++-----
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
index 40373db..8018cad 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/id.c
[...]
@@ -43,15 +44,15 @@ int omap_type(void)
u32 val = 0;
if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP24XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (soc_is_am33xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(AM33XX_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (cpu_is_omap34xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP343X_CONTROL_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
} else if (cpu_is_omap44xx()) {
- val = omap_ctrl_readl(OMAP4_CTRL_MODULE_CORE_STATUS);
+ val = omap_control_status_read();
Isn't it better to merge now identical code into one *if*?
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
