On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]> wrote: > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c > b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c > index d7f55e4..a3831a2 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c > @@ -3156,6 +3156,7 @@ static struct omap_clk omap44xx_clks[] = { > CLK(NULL, "dss_tv_clk", &dss_tv_clk, > CK_443X), > CLK(NULL, "dss_48mhz_clk", &dss_48mhz_clk, > CK_443X), > CLK(NULL, "dss_dss_clk", &dss_dss_clk, > CK_443X), > + CLK(NULL, "dss_fck", &dss_fck, > CK_443X), > CLK("omapdss_dss", "ick", &dss_fck, > CK_443X),
Is it right to re-use dss_fck for the "ick" here? I think it is due to omap4 modulemode stuff but I don't have DM in front of me and wanted a double-check... Regards, Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
