On 02/07/2013 03:51 AM, Mark Jackson wrote:
> Okay ... I have made some progress, but it's not ideal.
> 
> Currently I've hacked the GPMC DT driver (gpmc_probe_dt(), etc) so it now 
> handles setting up the
> chip selects and timings for NOR devices, e.g.
> 
>               gpmc: gpmc@50000000 {
>                       status = "okay";
>                       ranges = <0 0 0x08000000 0x08000000>;   /* CS0: NOR 16M 
> */
>                       
>                       nor@0,0 {
>                               compatible = "spansion,s29gl064n90t", 
> "cfi-flash";
>                               reg = <0 0 0>;
>                               bank-width = <2>;
> 
>                               gpmc,sync-clk = <0>;
>                               gpmc,cs-on = <10>;
>                               gpmc,cs-rd-off = <150>;
>                               gpmc,cs-wr-off = <150>;
>                               gpmc,adv-on = <10>;
>                               gpmc,adv-rd-off = <10>;
>                               gpmc,adv-wr-off = <10>;
>                               gpmc,oe-on = <30>;
>                               gpmc,oe-off = <150>;
>                               gpmc,we-on = <30>;
>                               gpmc,we-off = <150>;
>                               gpmc,rd-cycle = <150>;
>                               gpmc,wr-cycle = <150>;
>                               gpmc,access = <130>;
>                               gpmc,page-burst-access = <10>;
>                               gpmc,cycle2cycle-diff = <1>;
>                               gpmc,cycle2cycle-same = <1>;
>                               gpmc,cycle2cycle-delay = <10>;
>                               gpmc,wr-data-mux-bus = <60>;
>                       };
>               };
> 
> But the physmap driver (of_flash_probe()) is unable to use this information.  
> It seems that although
> I can call of_flash_probe() from my NOR setup code, the platform_device being 
> reference is wrong.
> 
> The platform_device passed to my gpmc_probe_nor_child() routine from 
> gpmc_probe_dt() points to my
> gpmc entry (above), but the physmap probe requires its own DT entry (rather 
> than a node child such
> as my NOR entry with the GPMC device entry).
> 
> So I need to have any extra entry in the DT file as follows:-
> 
>       nor-flash@08000000 {
>               compatible = "spansion,s29gl064n90t", "cfi-flash";
>               reg = <0x08000000 0x00800000>;
>               bank-width = <2>;
>       };
> 
> So the GPMC entry handles all the chip select and timing setup, but the 2nd 
> entry is the only one
> the physmap driver can see.
> 
> Would it be acceptable to re-code of_flash_probe() to allow either a child 
> device_node to be passed
> or a platform_device ?

Ideally, it should be a child device of the gpmc so that if the gpmc
device fails to init correctly, the child is not registered.

I need to think about this some more to figure out the best way to
handle nor.

Cheers
Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to