Hi,

On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 01:38:16PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> Since the condition is not an error but a warning, replace
> printk KERN_ERR with dev_warn.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ezequiel Garcia <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c 
> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
> index 4771945..fd6e35b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/gpmc-onenand.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ void gpmc_onenand_init(struct omap_onenand_platform_data 
> *_onenand_data)
>  
>       if (cpu_is_omap24xx() &&
>                       (gpmc_onenand_data->flags & ONENAND_SYNC_READWRITE)) {
> -             printk(KERN_ERR "Onenand using only SYNC_READ on 24xx\n");
> +             dev_warn(dev, "OneNAND using only SYNC_READ on 24xx\n");

it would seem more natural to use dev_err() instead.

-- 
balbi

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to