* Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]> [130405 06:01]:
> OMAP5 has backward compatible PRCM block and it's programming
> model is mostly similar to OMAP4. Same is going to be maintained
> for future OMAP4 based SOCs. Hence consolidate the OMAP4 power
> management code so that it can be re-used on OMAP5 and later devices.
> 
> While at it, update the kernel-doc for omap4_pm_init().
> 
> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/Makefile                       |    9 +--
>  arch/arm/mach-omap2/{pm44xx.c => pm_omap4plus.c}   |   58 
> ++++++++++++++++----
>  .../mach-omap2/{sleep44xx.S => sleep_omap4plus.S}  |    0
>  3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/{pm44xx.c => pm_omap4plus.c} (83%)
>  rename arch/arm/mach-omap2/{sleep44xx.S => sleep_omap4plus.S} (100%)

I suggest you leave out the rename. That just adds churn and has
flame potential.

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to