On Tuesday 09 July 2013 05:06 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
>>>> +/* dma_system */
>>>> > >> +static struct omap_hwmod_irq_info dra7xx_dma_system_irqs[] = {
>>>> > >> +     { .name = "0", .irq = 12 + DRA7XX_IRQ_GIC_START },
>>>> > >> +     { .name = "1", .irq = 13 + DRA7XX_IRQ_GIC_START },
>>>> > >> +     { .name = "2", .irq = 14 + DRA7XX_IRQ_GIC_START },
>>>> > >> +     { .name = "3", .irq = 15 + DRA7XX_IRQ_GIC_START },
>>>> > >> +     { .irq = -1 }
>>>> > >> +};
>>> > > 
>>> > > I think these should no longer be needed?
>> > 
>> > These are needed only for dma because mach-omap2/dma.c still creates
>> > devices from hmwod and which are used by plat/dma.c.
>> > These irqs for sdma exist even in the cleaned up omap4 and omap5 hmwod 
>> > files.
>> > I'll try and get rid of that dependency of plat/dma on mach/dma to create 
>> > devices.
> OK great.

Looks like this wouldn't be possible because drivers/dma/omap-dma.c is the one 
which is
probing the sdma device created using device tree. So we can't have 
plat-omap/dma.c probe the
same device.

>  

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to