On 08/09/2013 03:53 AM, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
> From: "Ivan T. Ivanov" <iiva...@mm-sol.com>
> 
> MSM USB3.0 core wrapper consist of USB3.0 IP (SNPS)
> and HS, SS PHY's controll and configuration registers.

s/controll/control/

> It could operate in device mode (SS, HS, FS) and host
> mode (SS, HS, FS, LS).

> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-ssusb.txt 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/msm-ssusb.txt

> +MSM SuperSpeed DWC3 USB SoC controller
> +
> +Required properities :
> +- compatible : sould be "qcom,dwc3-hsphy";
...
> +Required properities :
> +- compatible : sould be "qcom,dwc3-ssphy";

I would expect different compatible values to be documented in different
files.

> +Optional properties :
> +- gdsc-supply : phandle to the globally distributed switch controller
> +  regulator node to the USB controller.

Which of the 3 compatible values that were described above is that
property optional for?

> +Sub nodes:
> +- Sub node for "DWC3 USB3 controller".
> +  This sub node is required property for device node. The properties
> +  of this subnode are specified in dwc3.txt.

Why not represent the PHY and USB controller as separate top-level
nodes? They can point at each-other with phandles if they need to know
each-others' identity.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to