On 08/27/2013 05:11 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
Remove the empty am33xx_sram_init() function.
Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c
index 4bd0968..305fc2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/sram.c
@@ -285,11 +285,6 @@ static inline int omap34xx_sram_init(void)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3 */
-static inline int am33xx_sram_init(void)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-
int __init omap_sram_init(void)
{
omap_detect_sram();
@@ -299,8 +294,6 @@ int __init omap_sram_init(void)
omap242x_sram_init();
else if (cpu_is_omap2430())
omap243x_sram_init();
- else if (soc_is_am33xx())
- am33xx_sram_init();
else if (cpu_is_omap34xx())
omap34xx_sram_init();
Suspend resume for AM33xx as of right now uses this function. This patch
[1] uses this function to push the low-level suspend code to sram, it
was added here to be consistent with other platforms that utilize the
same type of functionality (omap34xx).
Regards,
Dave
[1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=137581164813160&w=2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
