On 28.08.2013 13:40, Tero Kristo wrote: > On 08/28/2013 01:14 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> On 28/08/13 12:48, Tero Kristo wrote: >>> On 08/28/2013 12:22 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I'm seeing odd clock behavior with Beagle, booting with DT. I'm using >>>> v3.11-rc7 + DSS DT patches. >>> >>> I guess you are not using the clock DT patches? Just making sure I >>> didn't break anything. >> >> No, plain rc7 with my DSS DT patches. >> >>>> So, for some reason, the first clk_set_rate goes wrong. Any ideas? >>> >>> Hmm, strange. I am not seeing similar behavior, but I am calling >>> clk_set_rate in different location.... also I am using clock DT patches >>> (don't try the current version though, as I am reworking them.) >>> >>> [ 0.000000] dpll4_ck: 432000000 >>> [ 0.000000] dpll4_m4_ck: 72000000 >>> [ 0.000000] dpll4_m4x2_ck: 144000000 >>> [ 0.000000] dss1_alwon_fck_3430es2: 144000000 >>> [ 0.000000] dpll4_ck: 432000000 >>> [ 0.000000] dpll4_m4_ck: 86400000 >>> [ 0.000000] dpll4_m4x2_ck: 172800000 >>> [ 0.000000] dss1_alwon_fck_3430es2: 172800000 >>> >>> Do you see the error only when setting to some specific rate (86400000) >>> or it doesn't matter? >> >> I also tried setting to 72000000, with the same result. >> >> Do you know if I can somehow easily get debug prints from the clock >> framework, that could lighten up the issue? > > There isn't any good config option for that, I would suggest add prints > to the clk_set_rate and then for the clocks you are interested in, print > results for the recalc_rate / set_rate ops also.
Tomi, did you make any progress on this issue? If not I'll try to dig into it later this week. BTW: Whats the current plan for your OMAPDSS DT patchset? Is it queued for v3.12 (this merge windows)? And do you have a git tree to pull the latest version from? Thanks, Stefan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
