On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:23:42AM +0100, Jean-Francois Moine wrote: > But now, I am wondering again about these `empty`codecs: > - in a DT context, should we continue to add / modify such codecs? > - what do you think about my generic DT codec? (indeed, I would do a new > version according to the previous remarks)
We still want to be able to have users just name the CODEC on their board rather than have to type in all the details from the datasheet, if we're going to try to amalgamate the drivers it should still let people do that.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
