On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 04:51:53PM +0530, Sourav Poddar wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 November 2013 03:59 PM, Mark Brown wrote:

> >>+   void    (*configure_from_slave)(struct spi_device *spi, u8 *val);

> >Clearly this is far too unstructured to be useful, this is only ever
> >going to work with one specific combination of slave and master since
> >there's absolutely no semantics defined.

> I thought "val" might be good enuf, and this can be filled with whatever
> data that need to be used from slave into master(irrespective of
> slave and master?).

The name isn't the issue, it's the fact that you're passing a completely
unspecified blob of data.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to