On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:42:14PM +0200, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 06:33:04PM +0200, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > > > > IN_CARD_SERVICES was #define'd but not used, so let's remove it. > > > > > > NAK. > > > > > > This breaks compilation of the pcmcia-cs userspace utils. > > > > then it is time to finally fix pcmcia-cs. > > Russell -- what exactly do you still need pcmcia-cs for (and why exactly > can't you switch to pcmciautils); and do you need a full-fledged pcmcia-cs > interface?
The problem I have is that I have a machine here which is in regular use. The original development for the platform finished several years back and the CVS server which had all the userspace source on has *gone*. So, I *really* don't care about breaking the pcmcia-cs build. What I care about is being able to continue to regularly use the machine _and_ test out later kernels on the platform. That means I've no problem with this patch to remove IN_CARD_SERVICES. -- Russell King Linux kernel 2.6 ARM Linux - http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/ maintainer of: _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia