On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:30:27PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > thanks for testing -- I think module insertion & removal, combined with card > > insertion & ejection or suspend / resume might be the most likely error path > > this time; though I couldn't create any issues here on my test box... > > I did the suggested testing now and everything still behaves like the > 2.6.30-distro kernel from Debian. Cool work! > > This also means, I discovered something I never noticed before. This happens > when I remove CF-cards (same for both types I have lying here): > > [ 150.313371] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: pccard: PCMCIA card inserted > into slot 0 > [ 150.314593] pcmcia 0.0: pcmcia: registering new device pcmcia0.0 > [ 150.392217] Probing IDE interface ide2... > [ 150.667050] hde: SanDisk SDCFH-128, CFA DISK drive > [ 151.306831] ide2 at 0xc100-0xc107,0xc10e on irq 11 > [ 151.306939] hde: max request size: 128KiB > [ 151.306948] hde: 250880 sectors (128 MB) w/1KiB Cache, CHS=980/8/32 > [ 151.307042] hde: hde1 > [ 151.327094] ide-cs: hde: Vpp = 0.0 > [ 154.778843] pcmcia_socket pcmcia_socket0: pccard: card ejected from slot 0 > [ 154.779280] Trying to free nonexistent resource > <000000000000c10e-000000000000c10e> > [ 154.779289] Trying to free nonexistent resource > <000000000000c100-000000000000c107> > > The last two lines sound like a problem. Is it known? (I repeat: This is not a > regression of your patches, it also happens with 2.6.30.)
Ping? (This time without dropped CC :)) Has anyone seen this message? Is it intended? -- Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
