On Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:26:54 -0400 Jeff Garzik <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 04/20/2010 01:33 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > Jeff, > > > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 01:29:33PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >> On 04/20/2010 01:23 PM, Dominik Brodowski wrote: > >>> > >>> On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 07:54:11PM +0200, Kristoffer Ericson wrote: > >>>> This patch adds idstrings for Kingston 1GB/4GB and Transcend 4GB/8GB. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>>> Signed-off-by: Kristoffer Ericson<[email protected]> > >>> > >>> Applied to the PCMCIA urgent tree -- Bartlomiej, David and Jeff, do you > >>> agree this is pused upstream through PCMCIA? > >> > >> PCI ID additions are normally pushed through the relevant subsystem tree > >> and not the PCI tree, so I do not understand why PCMCIA must be > >> different. > >> > >> But, it is a simple change and no big deal to push via PCMCIA tree. > > > > Actually, I do not care either way -- so it isn't a "must" at all... So if > > you prefer to pick it up, I'm all fine with it. Just let me know how you > > prefer :) > > > I would tend to prefer that ID patches go through the libata/IDE > subsystem trees, to be similar to PCI and other bus ID patches. Goodie, then I know where to drop the patches in the future. Thanks for clearing that up. > > But it is such a small matter that, if you have already applied the > patch to your tree, I would rather not waste your time removing the patch! > > If you have not yet applied it, though, I can merge it into my tree. > > Jeff > > -- Kristoffer Ericson <[email protected]> _______________________________________________ Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
