On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> To prevent broken messages like:
> 
> [  204.024291] eth%d: pcnet_reset_8390() did not complete.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.s...@pengutronix.de>
> Cc: Dominik Brodowski <li...@dominikbrodowski.net>
> Cc: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>
> Cc: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>

and

On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 07:50:36AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> It looks as if the printks in get_ax88190 are
> incorrect and were duplicated and superceded by a
> test in pcnet_config, so I removed them.
> 
> Changed the level of the ax88190 test to KERN_NOTICE
> to match the other message styles in pcnet_config.
> 
> Compiled but untested.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <j...@perches.com>

look good from a PCMCIA point of view, therefore:

Signed-off-by: Dominik Brodowski <li...@dominikbrodowski.net>

Thanks,
        Dominik

_______________________________________________
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia

Reply via email to