Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:07, Christian Dietrich
<qy03f...@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
Christian Dietrich <qy03f...@stud.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> writes:
I don't have any problems with any of these from a
m68knommu point of view. I can merge them via the
m68knommu git tree if you want?
If there aren't any complaints from the m68k people i'm fine with
that.
Hm, last message was two weeks ago, so perhaps the m68k people (with
mmu) have no complaints with these patches and they can be included in
the m68knommu tree?
Sorry, I've been a bit too busy with other things...
- arch/m68k: Removing dead GG2 config option
Fine for me
- arch/m68k{,nommu}: Removing dead SMP config option
Are there any SMP m68k systems coming?
If yes, we may want to keep it. From the other hand, probably many
other places
need adjustment for SMP too, so the few checks for CONFIG_SMP may give a
false feeling of readiness for SMP.
- arch/m68knommu: Removing dead M68KFPU_EMU config option
With the imminent(?) merge of mmu and nommu, perhaps we want to keep it?
I think what is in there is so old and decrepit that it is more
of a hindrance than a help :-) When we merge we should just be
using what is currently in the m68k part of the source. So I am
happy to remove the m68knommu FPU code right now.
Regards
Greg
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- ge...@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: g...@snapgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close FAX: +61 7 3217 5323
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
_______________________________________________
Linux PCMCIA reimplementation list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pcmcia
